Thursday, July 15, 2010

Goin' Down to Tennessee

"His parents try to freeze his identity and to erect a wall around it."

Going down for a few days to see the old folks. In twelve hours I'll be sipping grave scotch at the knobbly elbow of me Da. I want to return to this conversation when I get back. But it makes me think of my mother's response last time we talked about the War, or whatever it is. She said, roughly, But Sweetie, you're young, urban and educated: people like you oppose every war. Well, when you put it like it does sound pretty bad. I assumed I'd been insulted but wasn't quick enough to see how. Not insulted, exhorted: she comes from a Southern military family, and she is genuinely concerned for me and for the country, should the nation's prime specimens of manhood (such as we are) choose not to fight for worthwhile causes and should word of our moral passivity get out to those who prey on the weak and passive. I can sort of think my way back into that way of seeing it; the undertow is still convincing enough to keep me near my waterwings, gotta say. The continental shelf--beyond which all that cold murk rises with near-natural fury-- is culture. What I mean is that she's not wrong, as much as it galls me, to point out my sad demographic tendencies: our opinions about the war are not just opinions: mine are connected to a certain way of walking that I learned to do in order to look up at tall buildings and cross the street in traffic.

She was the one who raised me to be compassionate, feminist, New Testiment-quoting and a reader, who encourage my curiosity and my writing, most of the stuff that led me very naturally to where I am now. Somehow she can't see the connections, Lord love her. Somehow, although she has no use for this compliment, it was her mystagoguery that brought me here.

The connection you make to theatre, role-playing, a phase for the young, seems really important, and I hadn't seen it. So, yeah: line dancing stock brokers, suburban kids posting Facebook photos of themselves flashing gang signs, Martha Stewart's multifarious adhesive-sniffing minions, some marching band kid tightening his scrotum to walk into school wearing his first Mötley Crüe concert t, and my buddy Garth learning Sanskrit so he can study Buddhism, all these fine Americans are somewhere in the same conversation. Interesting how strict the social taboos are against that sort of behavior, too. Who t'feck you thank you are, boy? That suspicion must be there for good evolutionary reasons, which I suspect the species has now largely outgrown. I think it has to do with the sort of social regulation you're describing below.

And yet people who manage to be cool or natural (or, like, educated) or who succeed in becoming themselves, somehow do it by disregarding the taboos and pretending with conviction. Maybe the acquisition of a social and cultural gestures isn't much different than the acquisition of language. 'Love' and 'justice' exist no more than jazz rhythms or Chanel's boyish lines until you learn them and move to them, use them in a sentence. And soon your brain and your body don't remember who they were before they learned that gesture. Our growth is, quite precisely, organic.

I'm going to take The Hidden Wound with, and do some rereading. Barely remember it.

2 comments:

  1. I think your language-acquisition comparison is probably spot on, because we pick up identity pretty much DESPITE our sweet selves. I mean: you worked pretty hard to become the ostensible you, but you have to maintain a GRIP not to slide into your Ma's political taxonomy, even while you maintain your intellectual distance. Just like Chomsky/Pinker lingustics: we are born with slots in our brains [figurative slots, I hope] for verbs, nouns, adjectives, even ADVERBS, and then we spend our lives filling the slots. But if you fill them one way when you're young it's pretty hard to go back and fill them up a new way when you're old. Our lingusitic identity is pretty much coagulated by our early 20s, but our political identity tends to thicken later. Language binds us to our parents, and politics separates us. Good Lord it hurts to sit at your parents' table and disagree with their politics. It feels like they're questioning your very independent being. Politics can be ontological.

    This last year and a half with my parents here a couple of times per week I learned that actually our politics aren't really terribly different, but our REASONS for believeing what we believe show our time in American history. Maybe the deepest vein of that history is what appears to be the inevitable expansion of categories protected by legal rights: first it was the king, then it was the royals, then it was white men, then men, then smart cooperative grownups. Now gays and illegals, in some states. Even animals are afforded some protection. And corporations. It's a slippery slope, brah, and your identity is on it. How could you NOT be different from your parents with all this liberalizing going on?

    ReplyDelete